Our Sponsors

Where the Dems Stand

Posted on Wed Jan 16 2008
Comments: 1
Share: Digg | Hugg | Del.icio.us | Reddit | Email

It’s election time and the environment is again at the forefront of the minds of many people. All the candidates have their own take on how the government should handle issues, so here’s an at a glance of what some the 3 democratic front runners have stated their stance is on the environment, as found on their websites (The Republicans are covered in another article)

Obama:

• Obama will develop domestic incentives that reward forest owners, farmers, and ranchers when they plant trees, restore grasslands, or undertake farming practices that capture carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

• Obama will double science and research funding for clean energy projects including those that make use of our biomass, solar and wind resources.

• Obama will establish a 25 percent federal Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) to require that 25 percent of electricity consumed in the U.S. is derived from clean, sustainable energy sources, like solar, wind and geothermal by 2025.

Clinton:

• An aggressive comprehensive energy efficiency agenda to reduce electricity consumption 20 percent from projected levels by 2020 by changing the way utilities do business, catalyzing a green building industry, enacting strict appliance efficiency standards, and phasing out incandescent light bulbs

• 10 "Smart Grid City" partnerships to prove the advanced capabilities of smart grid and other advanced demand-reduction technologies, as well as new investment in plug-in hybrid vehicle technologies

Edwards:

• Creating a New Energy Economy Fund by auctioning off $10 billion in greenhouse pollution permits and repealing subsidies for big oil companies. The fund will support U.S. research and development in energy technology, help entrepreneurs start new businesses, invest in new carbon-capture and efficient automobile technology and help Americans conserve energy.

• Capping greenhouse gas pollution starting in 2010 with a cap-and-trade system, and reducing it by 15 percent by 2020 and 80 percent by 2050, as the latest science says is needed to avoid the worst impacts of global warming.

Of course, these points are just the highlights of each candidate. Please visit their website to see more indepth information. Also, look out for the Republican rundown to see where those candidates stand on environmental energy issues.


Comments

1
tater03 Says:

Thanks for this article. To be honest I just hope that they do what they say they are going to do. It really to me doesn't seem to be in the forefront with a lot of politicians. At least not the way I thought it would be for an election year.

What do you think?

   

Our Sponsors

Recent Comments

  • Roguegal says: I think this is fantastic for the environment. But what is the...
  • Roguegal says: This is just another reason why do not drink tap water. I just...
  • Roguegal says: This is a great idea and I hope a lot more people take advantage of...
  • Roguegal says: This seems really strange to me because these are the questions my...
  • mollyL says: SunChips! I absolutely love them. I had heard of Facebook here and...
  • mollyL says: Yes, those sound like golden rules to follow, even if you're not...
  • tater03 says: I don't have an account on Facebook but I think that this is a...
  • Categories

    Green Friends


    Privacy Policy | All contents copyright © AboutMyPlanet.com
    -->